Haven't we all at some point in time fantasized about stepping through a cinema/TV screen and into the world of our favourite movies and television shows? I certainly have!

With its modern, urban setting and stunning harbour, it is easy to see why Sydney leads the way as an ideal and versatile shooting destination. Movies shot here have been set in New York (Godzilla: Final Wars, Kangaroo Jack), Chicago (The Matrix and sequels), London (Birthday Girl), Seville (Mission Impossible 2), Bombay (Holy Smoke), Darwin (Australia), Myanmar (Stealth), Mars (Red Planet) and the fictitious city of Metropolis (Superman Returns, Babe: Pig in the City).

Whether popular landmarks or off the beaten track locations that are often hard to find, you can now explore Sydney in a fun and unique way with the SYDNEY ON SCREEN walking guides. Catering to Sydneysiders as much as visitors, the guides have something to offer everyone, from history, architecture and movie buffs to nature lovers.

See where productions such as Superman Returns, The Matrix and sequels, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, Candy, Mission Impossible 2, Mao's Last Dancer, Babe: Pig in the City, Kangaroo Jack, The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert, Muriel's Wedding, The Bold and the Beautiful, Oprah's Ultimate Australian Adventure and many more were filmed.

Maps and up-to-date information on Sydney's attractions are provided to help you plan your walk. Pick and choose from the suggested itinerary to see as little or as much of the city as you like.

So, come and discover the landscapes and locations that draw filmmakers to magical Sydney, and walk in the footsteps of the stars!

A GREAT ALTERNATIVE TO EXPENSIVE TOURS, YOU CAN NOW ENJOY EXPLORING SYDNEY FOR UNDER $10 WITH THE SYDNEY ON SCREEN WALKING GUIDES. FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT US AT SYDNEYONSCREEN@HOTMAIL.COM

Subscribe to the blog and keep up with all the latest Aussie film and entertainment news. Read about what the stars are up to, who's in town, what movies are currently filming or being promoted. Locate us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/sydneyonscreen and "like" our page!

Sydney on Screen walking guides now on sale!

Click on the picture above to see a preview of all four walking guides and on the picture below to see larger stills of Sydney movie and television locations featured in the slideshow!

Copyright © 2011 by Luke Brighty / Unless otherwise specified, all photographs on this blog copyright © 2011 by Luke Brighty


Sydney on Screen guides are now available for purchase at the following outlets:

Travel Concierge, Sydney International Airport, Terminal 1 Arrivals Hall (between gates A/B and C/D), Mascot - Ph: 1300 40 20 60

The Museum of Sydney shop, corner of Bridge & Phillip Streets, Sydney - Ph: (02) 9251 4678

The Justice & Police Museum shop, corner of Albert & Phillip Streets, Sydney - Ph: (02) 9252 1144

The Mint shop, 10 Macquarie Street, Sydney - Ph: (02) 8239 2416

Hyde Park Barracks shop, Queen Square, Sydney - Ph: (02) 8239 2311

Travel Up! (travel counter) c/o Wake Up Sydney Central, 509 Pitt Street, Sydney - Ph (02) 9288 7888

The Shangri-La Hotel (concierge desk), 176 Cumberland Street, The Rocks, Sydney - Ph: (02) 9250 6018

The Sebel Pier One (concierge desk), 11 Hickson Road, Walsh Bay, Sydney - Ph: (02) 8298 9901

The Radisson Plaza Hotel Sydney (concierge desk), 27 O'Connell Street, Sydney - Ph: (02) 8214 0000

The Sydney Marriott Circular Quay (concierge desk), 30 Pitt Street, Sydney - Ph: (02) 9259 7000

Boobook on Owen, 1/68 Owen Street, Huskisson - Ph: (02) 4441 8585


NSW, interstate and international customers can order copies of Sydney on Screen using PayPal. Contact us at sydneyonscreen@hotmail.com to inquire about cost and shipping fees.


All four volumes of Sydney on Screen are available to download onto your PC or Kindle at:
Amazon.com, Amazon.co.uk, Amazon.fr, Amazon.de, Amazon.es and Amazon.it


Cinema still a boys' club

Jennifer Aniston in 'Horrible Bosses'.
Chick flicks - Jennifer Aniston in 'Horrible Bosses'.
 


Rob Lowing, The Age, reports

Hollywood is still failing half its audience, but things are little better in Australian cinema.

In 2006, the US's Entertainment Weekly magazine threw down the gauntlet to Hollywood. In a scathing cover story, ''Hollywood Doesn't Give A Damn About Women'', EW suggested ways of fixing a business that mostly ignored half its film audience.

Six years on, what's changed? Notably, the audience. According to the Motion Picture Association in the US, adults of 25 to 60-plus years now make up 63 per cent of US movie-goers (of whom 51 per cent are women). The over-40 age group alone comprises 39 per cent of viewers.

Is that being reflected in Hollywood movie making? Not when two-thirds of the films released by Hollywood in 2011 surveyed here failed the now-famous Bechdel test. Popularised in 1985 by cartoonist Alison Bechdel, this defined a female-friendly movie as one that has two (or more) female characters who talk to each other about something other than a man.

Hollywood's approach is still flawed: US box office receipts fell 5 per cent in both 2010 and 2011; US movie attendance is at its lowest in 16 years. Audiences are voting with their feet.

Why? Apart from the obvious competition of new movie-on-demand options (downloading, parallel DVD releases), most recent flicks have been formulaic and/or infantile. No wonder US publications from Newsweek to Vanity Fair trumpet ''TV is better than the movies'' as US television delivers complex, grown-up female characters in juicy dramas such as The Good Wife.

In contrast, the choice for female moviegoers (and female performers) is woeful. In a February 2011 article for The New Yorker, 42-year-old 30 Rock creator and Mean Girls scriptwriter Tina Fey satirised her movie options: she could play ''Magazine Lady'' (workaholic woman looks for love); ''The Wedding Creeper'' (workaholic, etc, sneaks into weddings), ''Disregarding Joy'' (lesbian in artsy drama) or a villain in the (fictional) ''Moxie Girlz'' blockbuster, opposite a child star who is just ''a tickly feeling in Billy Ray Cyrus's testicles''.

In 2012, does Hollywood give any more of a damn about women? Let's recap Entertainment Weekly's main 2006 gripes, and see.

THE FEMALE QUADRANT

In 2006, EW noted that Hollywood marketing was based on audience ''quadrants'': men aged over 25 years; men under 25; women over 25; women under 25.

Sounds reasonable, if the studios made movies for each quadrant. But as EW noted, they didn't in 2006 and they don't now.

Only two in the top-earning 25 movies in the US (Bridesmaids, The Help) could be considered female-centred; out of desperation, let's include Twilight: Breaking Dawn - Part 1.

In the 50 top-grossing movies, at best only 15 could pass the Bechdel test. But that's only by cheating and assuming Noomi Rapace's kick-butt heroine in The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo and The Muppets' Miss Piggy are so feisty they're each equal to two female characters.

TO MARKET, TO MARKET

The top 50 highlights a problem for every thinking adult: Hollywood investment in mid-budget adult dramas has declined.

It's the quadrant issue again: studios want to, (a) sell their film in 15- and 30-second TV spots to, (b) grab the most audience in the first weekend. The marketing ideal is hitting all four quadrants, simultaneously. A Pirates of the Caribbean franchise? Ker-ching!

''Studios now are pimples on the arse of giant conglomerates,'' as one (unnamed) studio president pithily noted in a January 2009 New Yorker article on marketing. That's bad news for women aged 30-plus who are perceived as - oh, the horror - choosy: more receptive to reviews; take longer to get to the multiplex (due to personal commitments) and want more than explosions and fart jokes.

But let's play fair. Apart from sampling all Hollywood-produced releases in May-July 2011 (the traditional season in the US for big-budget multiplex-targeted ''tentpole'' movies such as Thor, Green Lantern, etc ), we also sampled November-December 2011 (when many Oscar contenders are released).

Even including female-centric dramas The Iron Lady, We Need to Talk About Kevin and Albert Nobbs, only 26 out of 72 movies passed Bechdel. (That's consistent with the entire 2011 Bechdel database, which, at the time of writing, has awarded smiley faces to only 75 out of 170 movies.)

MONEY, HONEY

In 2006, EW could point to the $1 billion collectively earned by The Devil Wears Prada, Erin Brockovich, Legally Blonde, Mean Girls, Sweet Home Alabama and The Princess Diaries and scold Hollywood for still thinking that female-driven hits were an aberration.

In 2011, the frugally costed The Help ($25 million) and Bridesmaids ($32 million) made $169 million (US) and $287 million (worldwide) respectively.

Compare that to the last Pirates movie: On Stranger Tides made $1 billion worldwide but reportedly will return little, due to its huge costs. Meanwhile John Carter, the mega-flop (so far) of this year, cost a staggering $250 million to make and market.

What do Australian women have to look forward to in mid-2012? Franchise offerings such as The Amazing Spider-Man and ludicrous ''high-concept'' (read: assembly-line action) movies such as Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter.

Any relief? Well, after earning $6 billion from male-centric animated hits such as the Toy Story trilogy, Pixar Studios finally responded to criticism with the upcoming, female-centric Brave.

And while Joss Whedon's The Avengers fails Bechdel (only one female lead), the director was honest enough to admit, in EW's May 4 edition, ''Studio executives will tell you a woman cannot headline an action movie. After … The Hunger Games, they might stop telling you that a little bit.''

Maybe, although Hollywood's excuse will be that the hit Games was teen-targeted. (Only time will tell if Kristen Stewart and Charlize Theron's Snow White and the Huntsman, which just opened big in the US, can please adults, too.) The irony is little seems to have changed since Ridley Scott (Prometheus) broke the male-centred action rules with a female lead in his iconic Alien - 33 years ago.

MIRROR, MIRROR

The 2006 EW article didn't only blame Hollywood. In ''A Note To Actresses - Embrace Your Wrinkles'', the mag complained ''by artificialising your youth, you're only encouraging'' Hollywood's youth-fixation. In 2010, EW collated US critics' comments on the ''mask-like countenance'' and ''big immovable forehead'' of Nicole Kidman. (It's not just Kidman: who isn't made uneasy by the rigid visages of Sandra Bullock and Meg Ryan?)

Out of 2011's top 50 flicks, the only adult women to be presented as real personalities, not just eye candy, were in The Help (older, African Americans) and Bridesmaids (notably, the vivacious plus-size Melissa McCarthy).

The remainder ranged from generic romantic sidekick (Penelope Cruz in On Stranger Tides) to Jennifer Aniston's nympho in Horrible Bosses and assorted dutiful wives and superhero girlfriends. Please, ladies, remember Helen Mirren (Prime Suspect, The Queen, The Debt): she kept her wrinkles and her career improved after the age of 45.

HOME SWEET HOME

Australia follows the US in viewer age patterns. According to the Bureau of Statistics, cinema attendance by older adult age groups increased significantly between 2005 and 2010: up 4 per cent for 45- to 54-year-olds and 5 per cent for those over 75.

But the gender split of total cinema audience is different here: more female movie viewers (53 per cent) than male (47 per cent). Are Australian women well served by local flicks? Unwind surveyed 20 films released in the past 12 months: of those, only five were female-led (Eye of the Storm, Sleeping Beauty, Here I Am, Oranges and Sunshine, Black & White & Sex). The rest were either ensembles with strong female characters (such as Face to Face), male-centric horror-drama (Snowtown, The Hunter, Mad Bastards), teen-centric (Wasted on the Young) or generic boy-meets-girl-and-dog/horse/marauding-in-laws (Red Dog, The Cup, A Few Best Men).

Our verdict? Australian cinema is more female-friendly than that of the US, but could do better.

No comments:

Post a Comment